Remote consultations in primary care across low-, middle- and high-income countries: Implications for policy and care delivery.

The COVID-19 pandemic mandated a substantial switch in primary health care delivery from an in-person to a mainly remote telephone or video service. As the COVID-19 pandemic approaches its third year, limited progress appears to have been made in terms of policy development around consultation methods for the post-acute phase of the pandemic. In September 2020, the International Primary Care Respiratory Group convened a global panel of primary care clinicians - including family physicians, paediatricians, pharmacists, academics and patients - to consider the policy and health management implications of the move to remote consultations in the primary care setting. The group gave special consideration to how and how far remote consultations should be integrated into routine primary health care delivery. Remote consultations can be a useful alternative to in-person consultations in primary care not only in situations where there is a need for viral infection control but also for the routine delivery of chronic disease management. However, they may not be more time efficient for the clinician, and they can add to the workload and work-related stress for primary care practitioners if they remain the dominant consultation mode. Remote consultations are also less appropriate than in-person consultations for new disease diagnosis, dealing with multiple issues and providing complex care. Ensuring health care professionals have the appropriate skill set to effectively deliver remote consultations, administrative and/or IT support and appropriate reimbursement will be key to achieving optimal integration of remote consultations into routine clinical practice. Addressing digital access and digital literacy issues at a societal level will also be essential to ensure individuals have fair and equitable access to the internet and sufficient security for exchange of personal and health-related data.

Valoración Geriátrica Integral de pacientes mayores y factores asociados de frecuentación en servicios de urgencias en la Era pre-covid19 - Un estudio português Comprehensive geriatric assessment of older patients and associated factors of admission to Emergency Departments in pre-covid 19 Era – a Portuguese study

Objetivos: Identificar factores asociados con usuarios frecuentadores (≥3 ingresos/año) en un departamento de urgencias (DU), mediante valoración geriátrica integral (VGI) y describir las características de los pacientes mayores de 65 años que acuden a urgencias. Métodos: El estudio transversal se realizó entre Agosto/2017 y Junio/2018 en un DU de Lisboa, Portugal. Se realizó una VGI además de la historia clínica. Se crearon scores clínicas, funcionales, mentales, sociales basándose en el protocolo de cuestionario del grupo de geriatría de la Sociedad Portuguesa de Medicina Interna y se desarrolló un modelo estadístico para identificar los factores asociados con la alta frecuentación. Resultados: Se realizó una VGI a 426 usuarios mayores de un DU. La edad media fue de 79.3 años, siendo 53,8% mujeres con un 84.7% de multimorbilidad, 51,2% de dependencia de las actividades básicas (KATZ), 75,6% instrumentales (Lawton < 5 en mujeres, <3 hombres y 40% de dependencia de la marcha (Holden). El 52% tenían síntomas depresivos (Yessavage), 65.7% tenían deterioro cognitivo (MMSE <24), 63% estaban desnutridos / en riesgo de desnutrición (MNA < 23,5) El 33,1% estaba en riesgo social (Gijón, APGAR familiar). La polifarmacia con el uso de un promedio de 6.5 medicamentos al día. Los scores sociales, clínicas, funcionales y mentales fueron adversos en el 48,6%, 79,6%, 54,9% y 83,1%, respectivamente. Hubo 2,7 admisiones/año y el 39,9% eran usuarios frecuentes de DU (≥3/year). Un modelo de regresión logística fue débil, pero mostró que los pacientes con polifarmacia, índice de comorbilidad de Charlson elevado y un estado nutricional adverso presentaban mayor riesgo de ser usuarios frecuentes. Conclusiones: El 97,1% de los pacientes tenían necesidades que justificarían un plan de intervención específico. Si bien no proporciona un modelo sólido, nuestro estudio ha indicado problemas nutricionales, polifarmacia y un índice de Charlson elevado como las características que se asocian con ser frecuentador del servicio de urgências.

Community lung health service design for COPD patients in China by the Breathe Well group.

COPD is increasingly common in China but is poorly understood by patients, medications are not used as prescribed and there is no access to recommended non-pharmacological treatment. We explored COPD patients' and general practitioners' (GPs) knowledge of COPD, views on its management and the acceptability of a flexible lung health service (LHS) offering health education, exercise, self-management, smoking cessation and mental health support. Using a convergent mixed methods design, data were collected from patients and GPs using focus groups (FGs) in four Chinese cities, questionnaires were also used to collect data from patients. FGs were audio-recorded and transcribed. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, thematic framework analysis was used for the qualitative data. Two-hundred fifty-one patients completed the questionnaire; 39 patients and 30 GPs participated in ten separate FGs. Three overarching themes were identified: patients' lack of knowledge/understanding of COPD, current management of COPD not meeting patients' needs and LHS design, which was well received by patients and GPs. Participants wanted COPD education, TaiChi, psychological support and WeChat for social support. 39% of survey responders did not know what to do when their breathing worsened and 24% did not know how to use their inhalers. 36% of survey respondents requested guided relaxation. Overall, participants did not fully understand the implications of COPD and current treatment was sub-optimal. There was support for developing a culturally appropriate intervention meeting Chinese patients' needs, health beliefs, and local healthcare delivery. Further research should explore the feasibility of such a service.

Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Severe COVID-19 Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide, leading to increased concerns about long-term patients' neuropsychiatric consequences. This study aims to describe the presence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in severe COVID-19 survivors and to identify associated baseline, in-hospital and post-discharge factors. This study is part of the MAPA longitudinal project conducted with severe COVID-19 patients admitted in Intensive Care Medicine Department (ICMD) of a University Hospital (CHUSJ) in Porto, Portugal. Patients with ICMD length of stay ≤ 24 h, terminal illness, major auditory loss or inability to communicate at follow-up assessment were excluded. All participants were assessed by telephone post-discharge (median = 101 days), with a comprehensive protocol assessing depressive and anxiety symptoms, cognition, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) memories recall and health-related quality of life. Out of a sample of 56 survivors (median age = 65; 68% males), 29% and 23% had depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were significantly more prevalent among younger survivors and were associated with cognitive complaints, emotional and delusions ICU memories and fear of having COVID-19 sequelae, sleep problems and pain after discharge (all p < 0.05). An important proportion of these survivors suffers from depression and anxiety symptoms post-discharge, namely younger ones and those who reported more cognitive complaints, ICU memories, fear of having COVID-19 sequelae, sleep problems and pain. These findings highlight the importance of psychological consequences assessment and planning of appropriate and multidisciplinary follow-up care after hospitalization due to COVID-19.

Old critically ill COVID-19 survivors: Patient and in-hospital factors associated with cognitive dysfunction

Background Cognitive dysfunction (CD) commonly occurs in survivors of critical illness, namely in those with severe respiratory failure, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), deep sedation and delirium. Many critically ill patients with COVID-19 are also expected to have an increased risk of CD, which may be exacerbated by specific conditions of hospitalization during COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to estimate the frequency of post-discharge CD in first wave COVID-19 survivors and to identify baseline and in-hospital associated factors. Methods This study is part of a multidisciplinary longitudinal project (MAPA-Mental health in critically ill COVID-19 patients), that is being conducted in Intensive Care Medicine Department of a Portuguese University Hospital. Patients >60 years, admitted due to COVID-19-associated Pneumonia, were included. Exclusion criteria were: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay (LoS)≤24h, terminal illness, major sensory loss or inability to communicate at the time of follow-up. Participants were evaluated with Six-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6CIT) by telephone. Baseline demographic, clinical and in-hospital data were collected, including sedation, respiratory support, major complications and LoS. Patients with and without CD after-discharge were compared. Results Thirty-two patients were included, with a median age of 72(IQR:64-76) years, mostly were male (66%) and none had previous clinical registry of cognitive impairment or dementia. Nosocomial infection (75%) and difficult weaning from MV (63%) were the most frequent complications. Deep sedation was used in 81% of the patients (median=20 days;IQR:15-42). About 81% needed IMV and 13% were supported with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). Median ICU and hospital LoS were 29(IQR:144-56) and 66(IQR:33-102) days, respectively. Follow-up assessment occurred 93.4 days (IQR:68-120) after-discharge. Based on 6CIT, 16% of survivors had CD. Comparing both groups, those with CD were older (73vs.64;p=0.020), had a higher duration of IMV (73vs.22;p=0.017) and mostly were supported with ECMO (75%vs.25%;p=0.008). Conclusion Data suggest that CD is more frequent among older COVID-19 survivors, and those who needed prolonged IMV and ECMO support. Despite full clarification of all mechanisms involved, these findings highlight the importance of a timely and organized post-intensive care response composed by multidisciplinary teams to optimize assistance to survivors of critical illness.

Neuropsychiatric symptomatology after severe COVID-19 in older survivors

Background:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide, leading to increased concerns about long-term patients’ neuropsychiatric morbidity. Currently, there is still few data regarding mental health after hospital discharge of severe COVID-19 elderly patients. Considering this, the present study aims to characterize the neuropsychiatric morbidity in old severe COVID-19 patients.Methods:In the context of an ongoing multidisciplinary research project, this study analyzed a subsample of patients aged ≥60 years, admitted due to COVID-19, during the first wave, in the Intensive Care Medicine Department (ICMD) of a University Hospital in Porto, Portugal. ICMD length of stay (LoS) ≤24h, terminal illness, major auditory loss or inability to communicate at the time of follow- up were used as exclusion criteria. Participants were evaluated by telephone in average 99 (±32) days after being discharged from the hospital, with Six-item Cognitive Impairment Test, PatientHealth Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale. Sociodemographic and relevant clinicaldata were obtained from hospital electronic records and clinical interview.Results:A sample of 39 survivors with a mean age of 70 (±6.3) years old were assessed. The majority were male (62%), married (64%), retired (77%), with low educational level (59%), and 15% lived alone. The average number of comorbidities and the daily medications per patient were 4.7 (±1.7) and 5.5 (±3.5), respectively.During ICMD stay, 69% had nosocomial infections and 56% delirium. Deep sedation was used in 74% of the patients (mean=30 days) and 74% needed Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. ICMD mean LoS was33 (±28.3) days. Based on follow-up assessment, 18% of survivors had cognitive impairment, whereas23% and 15% had depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. A positive and high correlation between depression and anxiety was found (rs=0.792;p<0.001). No significant associations were observed with cognitive impairment.Conclusions:The presence of this symptomatology may hinder a successful recovery once the patient is discharged back home. This is particularly relevant accruing the strong relationship between depressive and anxious symptoms found in this sample. Therefore, early screening and timely multidisciplinary support interventions to minimize these neuropsychiatric symptoms after discharge should be considered in order to achieve positive health outcomes.